The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 _{( spin me / revolutions)} 16:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Gemma Batterby

Gemma Batterby (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business person with no coverage anywhere to be found. Award doesn't appear to be notable either. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Claim to significance is that she won an award, the award itself doesn't convey notability. Refs are just about the award. Szzuk ( talk) 13:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.