The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Gary Swart

Gary Swart (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned BLP on an unremarkable businessperson. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, such this interview [1] or commentary by the subject in the media: [2]. Created by Special:Contributions/Lea210 whose other contributions are centered on Upwork, the company that the subject's business merged with. Not notable as a CEO of a nn company; present career in venture capital appears to be nn as well. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Wikipedia is not linkedin. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 14:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete. PROMO. Sourcing in article while great in number is very low in quality. A BEFORE doesn't yield enough to convince of notability. Icewhiz ( talk) 19:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.