From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Katie Nolan. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Garbage Time with Katie Nolan

Garbage Time with Katie Nolan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, a yet to be broadcast TV show by a non notable person whose article has been repeatedly deleted Theroadislong ( talk) 19:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

This is ridiculous... look around at the articles that you allow to exist on wikipedia... So much for having an open forum for the internet. The real reason this should exist is because Katie Nolan keeps getting deleted.

This is why many people consider wikipedia a joke. I don't have time to fluff up these articles right now, but every time I create them, so others can find them they get deleted. meanwhile pages like this /info/en/?search=Leah_Jenner & /info/en/?search=Brandon_Jenner exist? my original articles had more interesting information than these two junk pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmartin17 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 23 February 2015‎

  • Delete per proposal. No evidence of notability and frankly terribly written. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 19:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. There appears to be enough coverage at this point to warrant a Katie Nolan article, so my preferred outcome would be to redirect this future show to her page, assuming it gets (re)created.  Gongshow    talk 19:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • But until that page is created it should be deleted. If that pages is made the creator can redirect this there. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 19:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The Katie Nolan page is currently protected after being deleted three times. I would point out to Dmartin17 that Wikipedia is not, and never has been, an 'open forum'. It is an encyclopaedia. There is a policy WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS which explains that the existence of one article does not mean than another article should exist too. Those other pages might need looking at closer. If the only intention is that people should get information, why use a place that is 'a joke'? Katie Nolan surely has a website, and there are always places like Facebook - used by some of the biggest companies and many celebrities - where information can be conveyed without the irksome restrictions that we have here. There is, unfortunately, an attitude in many places that one MUST have a Wikipedia article, and the Alexa rating of Wikipedia is rather high which deoesn't help dealing with this mind set. As a non-American and a non-TV watcher, I'm leaving the debate here to others who are more knowledgeable. Peridon ( talk) 21:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Since there is no viable redirect target, and the show doesn't meet WP:GNG, at least yet. I have no idea if Katie Nolan is notable or not, but the author apparently chooses to complain about the article not existing instead of improving the draft they created. I see no reason why this couldn't be a redirect/merge when and if the bio exists, but for now I see no reason to keep it around. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Fox Sports 1#News and analysis programming I don't doubt it will be premiere, but until we actually can view the final product a redirect is more appropriate for the program until it gains the notability for its own article in the future. Nate • ( chatter) 02:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect To Katie Nolan I was the nominator but happy to see it redirected now that a properly referenced article about her has been written. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Fox Sports 1. It might premiere and get a whole bunch of secondary coverage, in which case this article can be easily restored. But it might also sink without a trace. Wikipedia is not a place to promote upcoming television programmes. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 23:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC). reply


I agree the show might not deserve a page, but Katie Nolan certianly does at this point. How can you expect people to edit it and make it prettier writing if their work keeps getting deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.60.68 ( talk) 05:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Garbage_Time_with_Katie_Nolan&oldid=1137870404"