The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There are very few articles about EVE's gameplay I could find to establish notability. Anything discussed in this article is already covered in EVE's own page. I do not see this article being able to rely on secondary reliable sources due to the lack of coverage.
Ardenter (
talk) 04:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete If we are going to have a separate gameplay article, it absolutely needs to show strong sourcing from reliable 3rd party sources (eg
Gameplay of Overwatch). Perhaps this could be done with Eve but knowing how it gets covered, I don't think it will see what we can do for Overwatch. --
Masem (
t) 04:16, 11 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect / Delete. Target is
Eve Online#Gameplay, which coincidently seems to be more up to date and more complete anyways. This is an unnecessary fork at this point. --
ferret (
talk) 04:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect - there is little way this article passes GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 14:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect - not a common or necessary point for splitting into a separate article.
Sergecross73msg me 15:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Eve Online#Gameplay. This article is
WP:CONTENTFORKING and the discussed topic (gameplay) is not notable enough to have its own separate article. The main article Eve Online can cover all necessary info about the gameplay. Wario-Mantalk 15:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.