The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Actually, it seems likely that the two "keep"s are by the same person. Sandstein 18:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Galimzhan Shahmardanovich Yessenov

Galimzhan Shahmardanovich Yessenov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are passing mentions, non-rs, profile pages. No coverage. scope_creep ^Talk 10:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Lacks in-depth coverage- subject is peripheral to the topic in most of the references. 1292simon ( talk) 08:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete non notable -- Devokewater (talk) 09:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep the article has been updated with plenty of citations
• Keep it looks like the article has in-depth coverage of the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.34.169 ( talk) 14:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC) reply

It really doesn't. Lets examine them:

Forbes is non-rs.

[1] Net worth page. No encyclopedic information and promotional.

[2] Talks briefly about his political connections. Reliable but not-indepth. Passing mention.

[3] An amalgamation of several other sources.

[4]] Self-published Profile. Fails WP:SPIP. Dependent source.

[5] Profile page. Not in-depth.

[6] Passing mention. Not in-depth

[7] No mention

Facebook. Non-RS.

[8] Announcement. Passing mention.

[9] Press-release.

[10] 404.

So the first 12 references, there is one which is really decent, which is insufficient for notability. Most of them are business announcements and run of the mill business news. scope_creep ^Talk 15:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.