The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Transwiki. Transwiki MBisanztalk 23:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Essay-formatted "paper". Completely the wrong tone and premise for a Wikipedia article.
Ironholds (
talk) 02:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment Perhaps this nomination is too hasty. While it is true that the article is an unencyclopedic essay format, that can be changed, as can the tone. My question for
Ironholds would be, is this a topic that does not merit inclusion on Wikipedia because it is not notable? Also, keep in mind that the article is marked as "under construction," and it was created less than one day ago. I'm going to wait until further edits are made to the article to make a decision about whether or not this article merits deletion, and I would suggest you do the same.
A Stop at Willoughby (
talk) 03:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Move to Wikibooks. Too much an essay / original research. —
RHaworth (
Talk |
contribs) 07:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.