The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article relies solely on primary sources. I have failed to find any reliable sources that will help the article to pass
WP:SIGCOV, which is currently lacks. If anyone is able to find reliable sources that help to establish notability, then please share them below. Furthermore, due to its reliance on one primary source, it reads like an advertisement, and this has been tagged since 2018. However, if reliable secondary sources are found and subsequently means that the article is kept, then this issue could be fixed. Despite all this, the article currently fails
WP:GNG and lacks SIGCOV unless someone can find significant reliable coverage.
Fats40boy11 (
talk) 09:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Going through relevant sources is difficult, as it's mentioned all the time in the news – a search for Fyrishov in
w:sv:Mediearkivet (has most, but not all, Swedish newspaper articles from the last 10–15 years, and then some slightly older ones) 23298 hits when looking at "editorial content", i.e. not press releases and so on. I've started trimming the ad-like language, but most importantly added a number of sources. It's a major sports arena and both verifiable and notable. /
Julle (
talk) 10:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Withdraw Thanks
Julle for this. I am withdrawing this nomination, and we can review this again in future if necessary.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.