The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and rename to more common English name of this late professor. Cleanup is recommended, though the details are beyond the scope of this AfD. Deryck C. 17:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Fu Ren-Kun

Fu Ren-Kun (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The importance of geopolitics is not shown and is questionable. The design does not meet the rules. To remove the complete insignificance and nightmarish content and design.-- Jürgen Klinsmann1990 ( talk) 08:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Comment This discussion page was created with the wrong template and never transcluded to a daily log. One of a series of malformed nominations. Fixed now--I offer no opinion of my own on the nomination itself at this time. -- Finngall ^talk 17:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep because the Comment. The nomination fails to express a clear rationale for deletion of this biographical article. If the subject is non-notable, someone will need to provide a much better explanation why. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:32, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Nothing in GS. or WP:TNT. Xxanthippe ( talk) 21:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC). reply
• Keep but only if we can confirm his honorary professorship at the state university. SwisterTwister talk 02:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment about English name The English name of the subject is "Fu Jen-kun" and not "Fu Ren-kun". It would be worthwhile searching a bit more. Maybe this can be relisted -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 08:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Worldcat - OK I managed to find the Worldcat entry. I'm not very good at analysing it though. I also found what looks like the subject's personal website. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 08:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep and rename per Lemongirl942. But the "Works" section should probably be removed per WP:LISTCRUFT, especially when little of it is in English. Timmyshin ( talk) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Some source analysis, please? There are a ton of Russian and Chinese sources listed but it's not clear how they relate to the subject (if they're just authored by him, then it's an excessive bibliography). czar 21:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep per being on the Russian wiki, and reciving award. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 14:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep & move -- I found this book: Taiwan and the geopolitics of the Asian-American dilemma / Jen-kun Fu. Author: Fu, Jen-kun. Publication Information: New York : Praeger, 1992 & a review:

• Book Review: Taiwan and the Geopolitics of the Asian-American Dilemma, by Wayne Patterson. Publication: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v533 (19940501): 193-194. Database: JSTOR Arts & Sciences VII Collection.

I see a few other books:

• Xinjang-Uighur issue and its development by Jen-kun Fu
• Taiwan and the geopolitics of Sino-American relations, 1972-1988
• Dynamics of political and economical development in central Asia

On the balance of things, probably qualifies under WP:AUTHOR given the age of the books. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.