- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 18:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
French Canadians in the Political Life of the Province of Alberta
- French Canadians in the Political Life of the Province of Alberta ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a book with no properly sourced evidence of notability under WP:NBOOK, sourced only to its sales profile on Amazon.com and not to any reliable source coverage at all. The mere fact that a book exists isn't what gets it a standalone Wikipedia article — it takes reliable source coverage demonstrating that the book passes one of our notability criteria for books, and there's none of that here. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 01:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Slicing and sluicing the pie a bit thin. We don't really need "Persons greater than six feet in height who serve on the Essex Council." There must be a need for the distinction, then the assemblage. Neither is met here, and that's independently of the poor sourcing. Hithladaeus ( talk) 13:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Zut alors, Deletez per nom. Unnotable, unreviewed book about a very narrow and obscure topic. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.