- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 05:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Fred Oesch
- Fred Oesch ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable architect, overburdened with external links that promote the subject. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes are are passing mentions. Created by Special:Contributions/Danielcasciato with few other contributions outside of the topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as clear advertising, the information is listing-esque and the sources are announcements and mentions; the works listed aren't significant for what we would consider convincing and there's nothing else motivating in notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete overly promotional article that does not show notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.