- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) John from Idegon ( talk) 18:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Fred Luddy
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fred Luddy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
previously deleted and recreated. Appreciate an admin checking to see if G4 applies. Fails WP:ANYBIO by a country mile. Obvious vanity/possibly UPE article. John from Idegon ( talk) 17:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- KEEP He passes WP:GNG with what's in the article now. Forbes [1] and Bloomberg [2] both give him significant coverage of how he went from broke to billionaire. Also the fact it was deleted 13 years ago doesn't mean it can't exist today since it now has reliable sources giving him significant coverage. The AFD at that time mention his company article was up for deletion too and it was also deleted then recreated later when it became notable. Dream Focus 17:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 17:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 17:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn perhaps I was a little hasty here. There are patterns that one like me who edits a lot of notable lists sees that indicate UPE and this hit all the check boxes. Still think it is likely UPE, but the guy does appear notable. Will close. Smack me with fish at will. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.