The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 00:27, 1 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Vice-dean doesn't rise to
WP:PROF#C6, and there's no evidence of academic impact that would pass C1: Google scholar doesn't even find her publications, and although Google books does have some hits for her they're not enough to convince me. I found one hit in Google news,
this story, but (judging from Google translate) it doesn't seem to have any content about her, it just has a paragraph of her opinions concerning multilingualism. Without evidence for passing WP:PROF and
WP:GNG, we should not keep this article. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 16:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JForget 01:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, per David Eppstein. Not enough to show passing
WP:PROF.
Nsk92 (
talk) 05:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.