- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Fox-IT
- Fox-IT ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability; and the page reads like promotional text that could be on its website. No 3rd party coverage of significance except an announcement that NCC bought them. FalconK ( talk) 01:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 02:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 02:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 02:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- delete blatant advertisement with unconvincing sourcing - David Gerard ( talk) 08:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as spam with marginal sourcing. Strictly a "investor prospectus" / "product brochure" content; no value to the project. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.