The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Blogs are not good sources. Google search reveals this term is applied indiscriminately to a lot of people in Minnesota, including other Vikings teammates.
Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 00:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Random nicknames from fans are not worthy of their own wiki articles.►Chris NelsonHolla! 02:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete The cites are to some fan blogs? Good night. No citations to the media in Minnesota, let alone the national media. Just because some bloggers thought that "Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse" would be a cool name for the Vikings' front four, there's no sign that anyone else thinks that they compare to the Four Horsemen of Notre Dame, the Bible, or the
Purple People Eaters for that matter. Not a terribly original thought on the part of the blogger anyway, but that's the type of honorific that goes to a dynasty type team.
Mandsford (
talk) 12:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Please note that the results that came up do not support the claims made in the article. As I noted above, all these results do is demonstrate that this phrase exists and is applied to all kinds of people.
Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 19:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
In fact, the results confirm what we suspected-- that this term has not been used in the media to describe the current Minnesota Vikings front line. In fact, the last use-- in 2001-- was even before Kevin Williams made the Vikings, and the other three came later.
Mandsford (
talk) 00:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete without prejudice to a future article that uses
WP:Reliable sources that directly discuss the use of the term. It does seem to be used indiscriminately to a lot of people in Minnesota.
DoubleBlue (
talk) 04:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. -
Yupik (
talk) 08:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.