- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Four-eyes model
- Four-eyes model ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence for general adoption of the theory. DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 13:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Written like an essay which makes the article fail WP:NOTESSAY. - KAP03( Talk • Contributions) 14:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is extraordinarily deep thought. Perhaps too deep for Wikipedia, alas. Delete per nom. -- Hoary ( talk) 14:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note. I was ready to say delete, but interesting thing that the German article exists from 2011 and it's still there. May be we need to research it a bit more before deciding.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 14:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- The interesting thing for me, Arthistorian1977, is that the German article is entirely sourced to works by de:Martin Zurmühle (born 1956), and that the latter article is the creation of SPAs Mucho1956 and Musou56. -- Hoary ( talk) 00:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.