- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 20:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Formswift
- Formswift ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promoy, RS issues, non notable, just reviewed L3X1 (distant write) 02:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to obtain clearer consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 03:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Relisted to obtain clearer consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 03:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 12:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 12:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- NomCom Normally I spurn PROD as sneaky, but in this case it would of been mroe effective. L3X1 (distant write) 03:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (chinwag) 17:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (chinwag) 17:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- a clear case of corporate spam; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – I don't see anything notable about this company. The "media coverage" isn't strong enough–PC Advisor just provides a list of free software in the category. & I wouldn't even call the entry on CNET page media coverage since it is in a category with 1,442 products and has no editor rating. – gwendy ( talk) 22:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Gwendy. JTP ( talk • contribs) 23:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORP and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 17:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.