The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 05:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply
A small (revenues under $1M/year per
[1]) local charity doing excellent work that appears to fail
WP:NORG. There is some coverage in The Times Herald, a small local paper (e.g.,
[2],
[3]), but I'm not finding non-
WP:ROUTINE coverage that clears
WP:AUD requirements. Tagged for notability for over a decade.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 15:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Agreed, this fails
WP:AUD ... too many of the references are primary. --
Whiteguru (
talk) 11:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails AUD, too few quality sources. ~EDDY(
talk/
contribs)~ 01:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.