- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 06:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Finland–Uruguay relations
- Finland–Uruguay relations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. marked for notability concerns 6 years ago, no real notable relations, no embassies, no visits by leaders, no significant trade, no agreements, any real discussions occur in the context of Mercosur to European Union rather than country to country LibStar ( talk) 01:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - FYI this article creator made a ton of these Finland relations articles. Some are longer than others and some, like Afghanistan–Finland relations, have already been redirected. Should the stubs be bundled together and considered for deletion/redirect? —Мандичка YO 😜 03:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I see examples of high level visits. The countries foreign ministers said that they've "had much cooperation in recent years". I see enough examples of a relationship to keep and expand.-- TM 10:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- firstly the foreign ministry website source is a primary source. Secondly, I found no evidence of much cooperation, no significant trade, no bilateral agreement , no visit by either head of state.
LibStar (
talk) 11:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- This would be an example of a very run-of-the-mill visits. Nothing to suggest they have any unique history or special relationship, such as Brazil–Uruguay relations. —Мандичка YO 😜 19:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- firstly the foreign ministry website source is a primary source. Secondly, I found no evidence of much cooperation, no significant trade, no bilateral agreement , no visit by either head of state.
LibStar (
talk) 11:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Everybody loves Finnland, but this is yet another "X + Y" article. Non-contiguous nations without significant political strife or critical interdependence, and a relationship that does not vex the world. WP not random facts. "Finnland and Mongolia relations" and "Bangladesh and Ecuador relations" should not exist. The foreign relations ministries will talk about these things, but those are primary sources. Rationale: 1) random information, 2) not notable as a topic. Hithladaeus ( talk) 17:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete unless reliable sources documenting relationships are added: Foreign relations between countries can be notable for their own articles, but this one doesn't seem to be very prominent. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 17:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.