- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
FinancialContent
- FinancialContent ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP. created by a single purpose editor. And lacking in depth third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 16:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 09:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Extensively unsourced to unreliable sources. Nothing to show notability or depth of coverage - David Gerard ( talk) 10:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I frankly consider this speedy material as it both contains PR and then also no significant claims of actual independent notability, all in all enough to delete. SwisterTwister talk 19:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- no indications of notability and strictly promotional. Article edited by Special:Contributions/Mdierolf who appears to be the founder of the company. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.