The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Overall consensus is for deletion.
NorthAmerica1000 09:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Un notable no independent coverage and no reliable sources, does not even describe festival but only people associated with it.
Summichum (
talk) 08:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. I couldn't find anything to show notability. I've let
WP:ISLAM know about the page and barring them finding sources in another language, this just doesn't seem to be notable. Full disclosure: I declined an A7 speedy on this and recommended that this come to AfD instead.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)
Keep for now I think we need a much more extended time to look for references on this topic. I removed yet another speedy, placedo n the basis of implementing the afd, but the afd has not yet concluded. DGG (
talk ) 21:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment the nom has been placing absurd tags on multiple articles of people and places related to this sect. , eg, "autobiography" and "BLP sources" on articles about places or people who died in the 11th century. In particular, the nom has also been tagging them as "han site", which might indicate the possibility of WP:POINT. DGG (
talk ) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: Seven days is plenty of time to find sources. If no one's found any, I don't see any reason to keep this around. If DGG wants to fish for sources and recreate the article down the road, no objection. Nha TrangAllons! 21:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.