The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Adeel Safi (
talk) 20:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)The reason given for the deletion tag is that the subject is a non notable. Had HINDWIKI read the references tagged they would have known the prominence of the subject. Please next time make sure you do your research before doing something as big as nominating a page for deletion.reply
Keep he is a prominent bureaucrat in the country who has served as Personal Secretary to Prime Minister of Pakistan. there are numerous press clips online which can be used to curate a bio.
This is detailed bio on the subject. --
Saqib (
talk) 06:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delte This article have no reliable sources per Wikipedia's
WP:BLP policy and YouTube is not a additional source because anyone can upload videos on it. HINDWIKI • CHAT 01:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete struck since your nom is already considered your !vote (see
Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion#Miscellaneous_advice). Youtube is neither reliable nor unreliable, though more content on youtube is unreliable than reliable. There's a big difference between using as evidence clips of broadcast news from the official account of a news media source vs a self-published video uploaded by a random with an opinion. (see
WP:Video_links#References) ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~ 08:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: The move from Draftspace appears to have been irregular, and the article and its sources are not great. On the other hand, the nomination is worse, and is bordering on
WP:SK3 speedy close given that one of the sources before the nom was from
The Nation, and as Principal Secretary to two PMs he has been a
well covered, influential, and controversial figure in English sources (+ Urdu?). The article is currently far blander than coverage suggests is fair weight
[1][2][3]. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~ 14:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per Saqib. Mar4d (
talk) 08:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep for bad nomination and many evidence that the subject is regularly mentioned in Pakistani press. I also see many sources
like this related to him. He certainly passes
WP:GNG as well known government official. Also the nominator is merely looking for additional sources (per his statement above) and this is wrong place to ask that. There's template for such request like {{refimprove}} and many others —Ammarpad (
talk) 06:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.