Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fat_Pigeon References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 01:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Fat Pigeon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable restaurant. Fails WP:NCORP. Spam and promotional article. Comments against the article citations is below. RationalPuff ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

List of sources

[1] Run-of-the-mill restaurant profile/guide.
[2] Project details of the Interior design firm
[3] Run-of-the-mill restaurant profile/guide.
[4] passing mention in a Travel Guide article
[5] Project details of the Wall Murals installation firm
[6] deadlink but it doesn't look like a reliable source anyway.
[7] Interior Design Award ( https://sites.ndtv.com/daawards/awards-2017-interior-award-hospitality/) for the firm designed it. An organization is not notable merely because a notable event was associated with it. WP:INHERITORG However, this could have held some water if it was something iconic and there were WP:SIGCOV, WP:MULTSOURCES
[8] Page doesn't show anything linked to the subject.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Delete Seems overly promotional. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Delete It is a spam and promotional article. VocalIndia ( talk) 16:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.