The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 07:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete sourcing does not exist, see this news google search
[1] nothing there. The sources on the page may well be primary, or government related. She is young, attractive, with a highly sympathetic backstory that is being pushed by someone, but that cannot be validated with RS.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 19:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 19:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Promotional BLP that fails
WP:GNG.
Aust331 (
talk) 20:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Does not meet
WP:GNG. I could not find any confirmation of the sources listed.
Metaphorical analysis (
talk) 23:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.