The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanztalk 00:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep - article was only started a little while ago. It would be more appropriate to tag that reliable third-party sources are needed and give some time for that to be supplied. If none are forthcoming AfD would be appropriate.
LadyofShalottWeave 03:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep- of course, I'm biased since I started the article. However, it seems that this organization is quite active behind the scenes in a lot of fairly important cases nationwide. I've put in a new cite to the American Bar Association's Preview of Supreme Court cases, which lists them in another case; is that sufficiently independent?
Agathman (
talk) 03:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I suppose another solution would be to merge it with the existing page for the organization's founders, the
Proctors- together they may be more notable.
Agathman (
talk) 03:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.