The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not notable. bd2412 T 02:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Faircoin

Faircoin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable cryptocurrency; article is promotional. There is possibly enough Spanish coverage to meet GNG, but spot-checks suggest it's all coverage in the context of discussing Enric Duran. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 21:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 23:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 23:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 23:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 23:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Well, I'm the author of the article (really translated from :es and only covered the template details). As I understand, there are two arguments against my first article, to delete it:

1. Not notable
2. Promotional - covers Enric Duran

After give an answer to these points, I would like to state that instead of proposing to deletion, it could be fine, in order to achieve more quality participation, to show me how to make the article better. Now, since I'm newbie and I don't know all the policies, excuse me if I don't cite policies properly, and please show me if I miss something. Also excuse my nonnative english.

1. Against Not notable argument, Power~enwiki specifies that is only notable because related to Enric Duran, but not as a cryptocurrency. Of course, Enric Duran is an important part of FairCoin and to mention him in that article is a must, but FairCoin doesn't inherite notability by Enric Duran. As seen in the references part of the article, there's a lot of coverage of FairCoin by itself, of reliable and independent sources. If more references are needed to prove this (which will surprise me), just tell me instead of proposing deletion.
2. Against Promotional, covering Enric Duran, I would say first that if the community thinks this, I would remove the content needed about Enric Duran, instead deleting the entire article. If promotional, as promoting a cryptocurrency, I win nothing if people are interested or not in the topic (evident), so is not selfpromotional. There are also no marketing content, and there's no propaganda and no attempts to convince to another opinion: the article is just useful as it provides information of a particular and notable cryptocurrency.

At last, as counterargument, I will cite the essay of overzealous deletion. The contribution of proposing to delete this article doesn't improve the Wikipedia, because doesn't help new users and doesn't improve the article. Is just a simple effort to say "this is not valid", compared with the effort made to put a good article, and to defend it right now. Also this pratice doesn't assumes good faith. Desatonao ( talk) 00:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Non delete To support related the "not notable" argument, Faircoin have a growing strong community in 40 countries, who extend its use for the real economy. Take a look here http://api.fairplayground.info/get_localnodes_list.html and is unique and not comparable to other cryptocurrencies because 1. Proof of cooperation algorithm developed by Thomas Konig and 2. fixed price decided By Faircoop assembly, which facilitate the use by people withoutbeing affected by market volatility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:462F:8400:C18:A64E:551B:21FF ( talk) 19:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete Subject is neither notable nor in any way relevant as an encyclopedic topic. The article is not neutrally written, and brings a great deal of PR material related to Enric Duran to try and support it. I don't put much to Desatonao's comment, it seems to be basically explaining how he does not have a COI, which is fine, but the discussion is not about him, it is about the article. Prince of Thieves ( talk) 20:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete There is a growing trend to put all crypto currencies on wikipedia they are not all notable. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 01:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete: promotionalism-only page for non-notable cryptocurrency. Sourcins is WP:SPIP / passing mentions. Spam. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.