The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
NW(
Talk) 03:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Obvious
neologism, clearly in violation of
WP:NFT. The author's username implies that they may be the creator of this neologism Intelligentsium 01:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
I found three refs on Facebook terrorism and added them to the article... no comment on keep or kill.
<>Multi-Xfer<> (
talk) 01:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
These references are not relevant to what is discussed within the article. Intelligentsium 02:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: page bordering on
original research, leaving little doubt that the creating user and the Dan Walder mentioned in the article are one and the same. Also contains broad sweeping unsourced claims, e.g. Daniel Walder is the first person to attempt to incite a social web based networking revolution via Facebook. --
roleplayer 01:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: Though this seems to be an emerging concept I couldn't find any reliable resources dealing specifically with the term. From what I could find there seem to be two concepts here: The first deals with terrorists using Facebook to coordinate their activities, and second deals with individuals or groups using Facebook to harass and/or intimidate other individuals or groups. These concepts might have a place in broader articles dealing with digital terrorism and bullying but don't, as of today, stand as an article. One day it might be an accepted term but that doesn't justify creating it today according to
WP:NOTCRYSTAL.
Narthring (
talk •
contribs) 03:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Wikipedia is a tetriary source, not for things made up in a day, and not for original research or synthesis.
Bearian'sBooties (
talk) 18:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Lol, finally some real OR. It is almost worth keeping as an example of the only actual OR/SYNTH I have ever seen in an AfD. Also, there is some BLP vio and issues about using Facebook as the defining parameter for the subject.
Anarchangel (
talk) 16:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.