From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Faber (company)

Faber (company) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not shown here nor reliable sources. Online search won't help much. Not notable as a subsidiary of Franke Holding, could be merged with parent company though 多少 战场 龙 ( talk) 15:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy. Shellwood ( talk) 15:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep I think notable company. Found some coverage in appliance trade publications. Will try to find some sigcov and post back. Andre 🚐 18:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ( TCGE) 15:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete This is a company therefore WP:NCORP guidelines apply along with GNG. I am unable to find any sources that meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 17:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Due to WP:PROMOTION. MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The itwiki page has about 8 citations, and I've dug through them there as well. Only four citations strike me as worthwhile; two are questionable in reliability ( [1] and [2]) and the other two appear solidly reliable ( [3] and [4]). But in general, they don't appear to have enough depth in total to be notable. SWinxy ( talk) 19:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.