The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC) reply

FaberNovel

FaberNovel (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant Promotion. corporate Spam. Highly misleading sources. Press in some else are company. Light2021 ( talk) 19:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- ref-bombed corporate spam, with statements such as:

• "It is also known for establishing and working with entrepreneurial communities such as coworking spaces[5] and startup incubators.[6] It has collaborated closely with and maintains strong connections to such organizations as Cap Digital, Silicon Sentier, La Cantine, and Le Camping!"

Pretty much the entire article reads like this. WP:NOTSPAM applies. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Wikipedia is not a marketing platform or a replacement for a corporate webpage. -- HighKing ⁺⁺ 14:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete per other editors. Not enough in depth coverage.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.