The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 02:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

FXstreet

FXstreet (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not covered independently in reliable sources - fails WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND - but plenty of coverage in press releases WP:PROMO. Not a notable organization. Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- I've found brief mentions here: The Sensible Guide to Forex and FT Guide to Foreign Exchange Trading. These are RS but the mentions are rather trivial, not rising to the level of COPRDEPTH. Another consideration is the article's promotional tone, with red links for the founders (to be developed later, I assume). Thus I vote "delete" as there's potential of COI editing and promotional intents. A substantially similar article was speedy deleted / userfied in 2011: link, so that confirms it. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete as everything has shown there being nothing close to the needed substance for both a non-PR and then also a substance article, both are enough for delete alone. SwisterTwister talk 22:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.