The result was withdrawn by nominator, and clear consensus to keep. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 15:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
"Lack of third party citations or notability I refer to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/This_WEEK_in_FUN for precedent on this kind of thing andyzweb ( talk) 15:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptrlow ( talk • contribs)