From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Phono-semantic matching. Randykitty ( talk) 14:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Expressive loan

Expressive loan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:DEL6 and 7: Term either does not exist, is a mistranslation from some valid linguistics expression in another language, or is a hoax. Note the lack of results from {{ Find sources}}. Mathglot ( talk) 22:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Mathglot ( talk) 23:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • There seem to be a handful of sources in Finnish, but since I don't read Finnish they might not be on point. If the concept has been written about in Finnish, it is odd that there doesn't seem to be a related article at Finnish Wikipedia. Google scholar only shows me one result (Volkova 2007, "Internationalism as an integral part of contemporary language") apparently written in English, but it's only cited by papers written in Russian. That paper doesn't seem to be available anywhere I can find it. I'm leaning toward delete, unless someone knows of sourcing in another language. Cnilep ( talk) 02:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 07:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Merge, it looks like Phono-semantic matching is related to the point that having two different articles is excessive. Also, I've seen terms like "expressive or onomatopoetic origin" (e.g. [1]) or similar used for this phenomenon, which makes finding sources difficult. -- vuo ( talk) 22:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.