The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:DEL6 and
7: Term either does not exist, is a mistranslation from some valid linguistics expression in another language, or is a hoax. Note the lack of results from {{Find sources}}.
Mathglot (
talk) 22:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)reply
There seem to be a handful of sources in Finnish, but since I don't read Finnish they might not be on point. If the concept has been written about in Finnish, it is odd that there
doesn't seem to be a related article at Finnish Wikipedia. Google scholar only shows me one result (Volkova 2007, "Internationalism as an integral part of contemporary language") apparently written in English, but it's only cited by papers written in Russian. That paper doesn't seem to be available anywhere I can find it. I'm leaning toward delete, unless someone knows of sourcing in another language.
Cnilep (
talk) 02:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge into a related article.
Phono-semantic matching seems close, but not quite the same phenomenon; maybe
Folk etymology is better, or simply
Loanword. Aikio does write about this phenomenon in his
PhD thesis (2009) (p. 33ff.), without using the term "expressive loan". This is a real phenomenon researched by scholars, so Wikipedia should cover it in some form. --
Florian Blaschke (
talk) 04:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 13:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge, it looks like
Phono-semantic matching is related to the point that having two different articles is excessive. Also, I've seen terms like "expressive or onomatopoetic origin" (e.g.
[1]) or similar used for this phenomenon, which makes finding sources difficult. --
vuo (
talk) 22:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.