- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Ex-Service, Service and Veterans Party
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ex-Service, Service and Veterans Party ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable and extremely minor Australian political party that only contested one election, the only sources available from a search consist of the Party's registration with the AEC as well as a couple of database listings, meaning it fails WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 00:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Australia. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 00:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete My initial thoughts were to keep, but on looking closely into this, I am struggling to find any significant coverage, if any on this party. WP:NONPROFIT and WP:CORP requires significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. Mr.weedle ( talk) 04:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.