The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sources are insufficient to establish
WP:GNG and are not RS (includes her bio on her PR firms's website, etc.).
DarjeelingTea (
talk) 23:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as a clear Facebook listing, not an article in our policies.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Article doesn't establish notability. Article lacks independent reliable sources. Google searches produces nothing to show notability.
CBS527Talk 01:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: Article needs a LOT of work, but clearly had sources -- Someone didn't do their WP:BEFORE, she's got a fair bit of coverage in major magazines and web sites. Oxygen is an independent source and fairly major. I also found stuff on her in
Ebony (major African American lifestyle magazine), assorted women's and African-American lifestyle sites:
Madame Noire (women's site),
[1]Black America Web, and other sites serving the African-American and entrepreneurial community:
[2],
[3],
[4]; travel sites:
[5],
[6] . Plus other random stuff:
[7]. This one meets GNG.
Montanabw(talk) 11:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
While I agree Ebony is RS, I question whether the small blogs and company websites you listed: "She's Wanderful" blog (Alex rank 535,044
[8]), "Brooklyn Buttah" blog (Alexa rank 12,543,151
[9]), "Leisure Group Travel" blog (Alexa rank 1,818,178
[10]), the company website of the PR firm
J. Walter Thompson, etc., meet our
WP:RS standards for a
WP:BLP?
DarjeelingTea (
talk) 12:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
I think it's so bad that
WP:TNT and
WP:SPAM applies -- and I've no interest in trying to fix it as it seems sure to be a magnet for more spam. Regardless of whether Montanabw is right about
WP:GNG, delete per TNT.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 14:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.