The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Eswatini–Turkey relations

Eswatini–Turkey relations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There really isn't much to these relations except some previous political support from Turkey. Level of trade is very low. No embassies, agreements or state visits. LibStar ( talk) 00:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete While clearly some effort has gone in to this article, there isn't much to report on apart from a little cordiality. Per WP:GNG there are no secondary sources presented that show coverage of this relationship. Chumpih. ( talk) 22:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.