The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Patent nonsense, Half of the sources are not notable. Many linked sources are written by Esha Tewari Pande herself Shobhit GosainTalk 07:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: looks like
WP:Promo. Article focus is on awards from a website without its own article.
Timeraner (
talk) 08:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, promotional article relying on flaky sources that do not establish real notability.
TheLongTone (
talk) 11:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as most sources are not reliable and those that appear to be either do not back the claim in the article or are trivial mentions. While there's an argument to be made for the notability of certain national pageant winners, there's no such consideration for runners-up. -
Dravecky (
talk) 20:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now and draft if actually needed - The article is neat and sourced and while I'm sure she's achieved several good things, there's no solidity and my first searches instantly found nothing good.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.