- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Esen Altuğ
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Esen Altuğ ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Kadı Message 16:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Turkey. Kadı Message 16:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Diplomats are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability — but three of the five footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the two that actually come from real WP:GNG-worthy media both just represent her being quoted as a giver of opinion rather than having the significance of her work analyzed. I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better Turkish-language skills than I've got can find better sourcing, but this as written isn't enough. Bearcat ( talk) 16:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.