The result was Summarily deleted, before this discussion was allowed to run its normal course. A write-up about an incident of the kind alleged here has to be stripped of speculation and hearsay, and the facts would have to be far more solidly sourced. And the resulting article, if it could meet other relevant criteria, would have to be titled for, and about, the event and not any one person. Hoary ( talk) 10:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Extreme BLP violation accusing a person of committing a heinous crime with no reliable sourcing. My db tag was removed. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 04:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I did not accuse him of rape. Mr. Angell has made himself a public figure in the discussion of what it means to rape and what constitutes consent. The article on him reflects that. I wrote about his being an on-the-rise viral video star because he "appeared to be" confessing to what "may have been" date rape and sparked online debate on what constitutes rape and the definition of consent. I posted the link to the actual video footage from the event in my first draft and have added more links from reputable sources: Jezebel and Huffington Post. Flamingnerd ( talk) 04:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Both of you need to read WP:BLP1E. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 04:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
@TMotB: I did not know that. Will copy into a textfile and edit in the sandbox (never hitting submit, just preview) if it gets deleted.
@Flamingnerd: Wikipedia notability is different from real-life notability. Unless this hits major media sources (New York Times or similar big-city papers) then it won't merit its own article. Section in rape culture? Likely; this makes more sense as a datapoint rather than a bio. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 05:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply