The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I think this fails
WP:BLPCRIME. It reads as a coatrack or attack page, and I do not think we need it. Guy (
help!) 22:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete ... I would be willing to consider this. If it can be proven that any of the sources are reliable and show adequate representation of the subject in reliable sources, I would be happy to reconsider.
MPS1992 (
talk) 00:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete .. The journalistic sources seem reliable enough, but without the criminal allegations there would be nothing notable. Since it's still in court, then per
WP:BLPCRIME it should be deleted.
FrankP (
talk) 09:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete being investigated for fraud is not a sign of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:BLPCRIME Apart from basic biographical details, most of the article concerns allegations which are as yet unproven.
Neiltonks (
talk) 19:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - could be added again if new info arrives.
BabbaQ (
talk) 14:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per BLPCRIME and NOTNEWSPAPER
Chetsford (
talk) 02:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete .. The journalistic sources seem reliable enough, but without the criminal allegations there would be nothing notable.
WP:BLPCRIME it should be deleted.
JeanDeLaRomandi (
talk) 23:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.