The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Mz7 ( talk) 04:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Ente Hridayathinte Udama

Ente Hridayathinte Udama (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. One review which is not enough to demonstrate film's notability. If I miss a specific notability criteria per above links pls let me know. Thanks Kolma8 ( talk) 17:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 ( talk) 17:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 ( talk) 17:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 ( talk) 13:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.