The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete we need multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. I see one, the Toronto Star. The penny stock ref tends to decrease my belief in its notability.
Smallbones(
smalltalk) 04:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment And I'm not convinced by the Toronto Star article. The company is not the subject matter of the article and only gets a mention in passing, fails
WP:CORPDEPTH.
HighKing++ 18:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete A run-of-the-mill technology company with zero indications of notability. Wikipedia is not a yellow pages or a platform for promotion. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability and fail
WP:CORPDEPTH and/or
WP:ORGIND. Since the company floated on the Toronto Venture exchange, there's a chance that the company was covered by independent analysts which would then help the topic meet the criteria for notability, but I can't find any. Therefore as it stands, topic fails GNG and
WP:NCORP.
HighKing++ 18:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.