The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a film, not
reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for films. This makes absolutely no notability claim at all besides purportedly existing; at the time of its creation in 2006, it tried for "won an award at a minor film festival", but that got removed within two days as it wasn't verified by the source that had been used to support it, and has never returned since.
The only footnote here is its own deadlinked
self-published website about itself, with absolutely no evidence of third-party coverage about the film in any
WP:GNG-worthy sources shown at all. And for added bonus, I can't find any media coverage, or even an IMDb profile, on Google -- literally all I can find is
this primary source staff profile and a bunch of wikimirrors.
There's just nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt this film from having to pass GNG on the sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)