The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Inadequate evidence for notability . The "100 most " lists are a technique of PR, invented for that purpose. All the referencesare either PR or noticces or his own writings. DGG (
talk ) 00:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Read through the referenced pages and saw that he has been featured in local newspapers like
The Punch. It might pass as notability considering he has also won some international awards
Mustapha dare (
talk) 09:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
KEEP-- I previously created the page and an IP tagged the page for speedy deletion, when AfD was still ongoing. I'll vote that it's kept and not deleted, since I've written it like an Encyclopedia and also, the article for sure passes
WP:GNG and
WP: NOTABILITY.
NNADIGOODLUCK(
Talk|
Contribs) 13:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete I'm not sure that
DGG was aware when nominating this that it was the exact same article deleted previously under another name and that the closer specifically instructed the creator to contest it at
WP:DRV if they chose, not just recreate it under another name. Even if not G4able, it's extremely promotional.
Praxidicae (
talk) 14:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. OhNoitsJamieTalk 15:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.