The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 01:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Andre🚐 23:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Sources are all passing mentions as the nominator points out. Not enough information to meet SIGCOV.
CollectiveSolidarity (
talk) 01:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. –
Pbrks(
t •
c) 16:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Only one of the sources cited appears not to be a press release about "budding hoopsters". Nowhere near enough independent coverage, and doesn't appear to be close to launch anytime soon. Smells deeply of paid editing: there's a discussion about this and related articles over at the COI noticeboard.
Storchy (
talk) 14:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.