The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There are very few sources in the wild, and the sources linked in the article appear to be cherrypicked. I'm not sure this is notable. -
AquilaFasciata (
talk |
contribs) 17:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: Can you clarify what you mean when you say the sources appear to be cherrypicked?
Curbon7 (
talk) 21:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep The party just won two seats in the parliamentary elections in Guatemala. Of course it's notable.
Number57 07:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep -- the sources already in the article are sufficient to meet GNG. Nom's claim that the sources are "cherry picked" makes no sense.
Central and Adams (
talk) 12:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
WITHDRAWN. I nominated this unable to find articles myself. I realized that it's likely due to my locale settings, and just because I couldn't find sources doesn't mean sources were cherrypicked. I jumped to a rash conclusion, likely because I had dealt with other nonsense articles the day I nominated this so I was still in that headspace. -
AquilaFasciata (
talk |
contribs) 18:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.