The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (
Talk) 02:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - Per nom. More specifically,
[1][2][3][4][5] all appear very promotional in nature without any real neutral analysis;
[6] is an interview/primary;
[7] is an opinion piece from a contributer. A search for other sources isn't producing any better content (see
[8] and
[9]). Deletion seems clear. —
Sirdog(
talk) 08:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - Per nomination, but primarily because references lack quality and are definitely not neutral. (See above) - 🔥
𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆(𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.