The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Alexnia ( talk) 14:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The article does not establish the notability of Electric Time Company. It is poorly written as well. Wissembourg ( talk) 19:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Sure, the article could be rewritten. But is it worth it? The question is whether Electric Time Company occupies a notable place in the history of clock-making, or contemporary American manufacturing, or some other relevant category. Nothing that the article mentions (the size of the company's current facility, its date of foundation, the fact that it has been featured in a Boston magazine, etc.) indicates that this is the case. Wissembourg ( talk) 19:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC) reply