The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MelanieN ( talk) 01:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Elaine Wan Chan

Elaine Wan Chan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography is not notable. The one secondary source cited, a one-line mention in The Straits Times, is trivial coverage. A BEFORE search for the searches "Elaine Wan Chan", "Elaine Chan Singapore", and "Elaine Chan music" (the search term "Elaine Chan" had too much noise and didn't reveal anything) revealed only one additional source, which turns out to be a primary source interview [1] in Tatler Singapore. There is no other coverage. With no independent reliable secondary sources and no qualifying criteria under WP:NMUSIC, the subject is not notable. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Noting that there was a previous AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Wan Chan in 2005 with no consensus. I think it's clear that discussion was completely unfounded in policy. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete does not meet notability standards. Not enough reliable 3rd party sourcing to show notability. For what it is worth it was not really until 2006 that Wikipedia created notability standards, in 2005 this was the wild west where people thought we could create articles on everyone who ever commercially made theatrical/musical productions. We have since realized this would make lots of hyper local directors and producers lacking any reliable sourced coverage notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 22:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.