The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Ekushey Padak. Article history preserved to allow selective merges to be carried out
SpinningSpark 11:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm nominating this & following articles. all of those article contain same text except one or two line in the introduction. i don't see any good reason to split one award into 11 articles. The main article
Ekushey Padak already covered most of the information. Main article isn't big enough. We can easily fit all of one or two extra info in the main article. My suggestion is delete them all and/or merge them into
main article.
আফতাব (
talk) 18:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep this all articles translated form Bangla Wikipedia but writing skill are not similar as Bangla. articles will be developed very soon with more details. Thanks,
ZI Jony (
talk) 19:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)reply
There is nothing special you can add. You can add all of special one/two line info in the main article with a section. You can add Ekushey Padak award winner in that field. But we already have articles for them. If you want to sort them, just go there and create a sortable wikitable.
Redirect to
Ekushey Padak for now. Per nomination, they currently pretty much duplicate the main article. Sections can be added there on the individual awards, taking time to really develop each section properly. If any of the sections starts to get too big for the main article, they can be split away one at a time as required.
The Mighty Glen (
talk) 22:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Ekushey Padak. As the articles currently stand, the individual fields can be added as sections in the main article.
MT TrainTalk 06:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Selective Merge to
Ekushey Padak. There should be sections for each category on that page, but until there's significantly more content there's no reason for stand-alone pages.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 20:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.