- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Edway Group
- Edway Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Purely promotional article non- notable firm No signifcant accomplishments or references. Recreated after speedy G11, brig here for more definitive result. DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- strong delete fails WP:CORP. sources merely confirm it exists, nothing in depth. Promotional. LibStar ( talk) 10:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and per LibStar: there seems no reason to think that this firm is notable. Nick-D ( talk) 01:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.