The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ATraintalk 21:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Non-notable PR person. All sources are lacking in actual coverage. Almost everything I can find is a passing mention or written by the subject. Fails GNG and pretty much everything... CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete A preliminary
WP:BEFORE showed simply passing mentions or one-off quotes.
Drewmutt(^ᴥ^)talk 23:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete- Looks like one of his PR specialties is writing wikipedia articles to promote.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Most references are articles written by the subject. No in depth coverage. Fails both
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG. --
Crystallizedcarbon (
talk) 20:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete – sources do not have in depth coverage about the subject or work that he has done that is of significant value to public relations. Fails
WP:GNG. CookieMonster755✉ 20:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. AdWeek/Business Insider gave him awards for his accomplishments in his industry.
[1][2] He also has a unique style and is an author.
desmay (
talk) 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.